Skip to main content

What Is The Correct “Number” to Buy Back Your Personal Freedom?

CNBC.com - October, 2010

When people discuss “the Number”—that is, the number they need to easily retire and continue their lifestyle—they usually miss the entire point.

The reason you are trying to calculate “the Number” in the first place is that you are looking for the bare minimum you need in order to purchase your freedom from the slavemasters of corporate America.

If you want to live in Manhattan and have a house in the Hamptons then you aren’t really looking for the Number. You’re still willing to be enslaved in order to achieve small incremental advantages over the overwhelming benefit of personal freedom.

So I’m going to make some basic assumptions:

A) You want personal freedom above all else. Which doesn’t mean you’re willing to live in a homeless shelter. You want some basic conveniences and fun in life. But you’re willing to forego extreme extravagances.

B) You aren’t going to send your kids to college.

C) You don’t need to own a home. B and C are usually the biggest expenses people have outside of the luxuries (see E).

D) You’re between the ages of 35 and 65. Above 65 or lower than 35 your Number goes down considerably. Above 65 and either you are cutting back on some basic lifestyle choices or your probability of living another 30 years goes down so you can more easily dip into your base savings. Below 35 and you can make it all, lose it all, and have fun making it again.

E) You don’t want to buy art, planes, extra homes, etc.

So now lets work bottom up.

Housing (and Car) costs.

If you live anywhere in the country other than directly in the middle of a major urban center then $3000 a month should be enough for rent and another $2000 for utilities, car payment (lease, don’t own).

For instance, here’s a fully furnished 2BR, 2BA apartment on South Beach in Miami with views of the Ocean.

And if you want to live one hour from New York City ,here’s a 4500 square foot house with a pool right for $3000 a month.

So you never need to spend more than $5000 total on living and car arrangements and you can live anywhere in the country with minor exceptions (80th and 5th avenue, Manhattan, for instance).

And you can probably do this fully furnished so you don’t have to splurge on furniture. My above article explains why rent rather than own but, here’s the short version: if a refrigerator breaks or a pipe bursts, it’s not your problem (or costs).

Food

Allocate another $3000 a month for food. I’m being super generous here but let’s say you are a family of four and you like to eat organic and all four of you are obese, knock yourselves out.

Fun

I assume $5000 a month, or $160 a day roughly. This takes care of all eating out, movies, books, culture, getting tango lessons, buying clothes for kids (at Walmart or Target — you can get label brands now).

Vacation

I’m going to very generous here and say $48,000 a year or $4000 a month for vacations. You can basically take a vacation a month (hey, you’re retired so why not). And if your kids need an extra pair of shoes, take $100 out of your vacation money that month.

Total per year:

$17,000 a month times 12: $204,000 a year. Lets round it up to $210,000 (an extra $500 a month for miscellaneous).

If you can make 10 percent investing per year (or about 5-6 percent after taxes) then you need $4 million in the bank. That’s your Number: $4 million dollars.

However, I think most people need significantly less.

A) If you are the type who can save $4 million and you are in your 30s, 40s, or 50s, you probably won’t be completely inactive. Consulting, speaking, writing, angel investing, should be able to generate some income. Every extra $50,000 you make after taxes per year (as long as its consistent each year) means you can reduce your Number by $1 million. So if you can scrape together an average of $100,000 per year then your number is $2 million.

B) If you are willing to risk riskier municipal bonds that generate 7 percent after taxes (or any other riskier investments) then your number goes down to $3 million (and then down to $2 million if you can make $100,000 consistently per year after that).

C) If you can use your Fun allocation for vacations (or if you don’t really take vacations) then your number goes down by another million dollars.

Combine A and C above and your number goes down to $1-2 million, particularly if you are relatively young, healthy, and able to generate some consistent income per year.

Note: The key, though, is to stay out of a 9-5 job where you have to work in an office, attend meetings, and say hi to people you don’t really like that much.

What investments should you make for a relatively easy 5-7 percent after taxes?

Pioneer Municipal High Income fund currently yields a tax free 7 percent. Other than a severe dip during the financial crisis when all closed-end funds were sold by hedge funds that were liquidating, the fund has maintained a price of 15, give or take.

MFS High Yield Income also yields 7.5 percent.

Also worthwhile to find stocks that might not be yielding 10 percent now but have a history of raising their dividends so that eventually you could possibly get much higher than a 10% yield on your initial investment. Eli Lilly [ LLY 37.45 -0.61 (-1.60%) ] is one that comes to mind, with a 5.2 percent dividend and a history of increasing their dividends every year since 1967. McDonalds [ MCD 76.99 -0.33 (-0.43%) ], which just raised their dividend to 3.25 percent but has raised their dividend every year for 29 years and still has all of China to look forward to getting addicted to their fries. Or you can piggyback Warren Buffett by buying the highest yielding stocks that he’s also buying:

Glaxo Smith Kline [ GSK 40.72 -0.90 (-2.16%) ] 4.4% yield.

M&T Bank [ MTB 75.73 -1.06 (-1.38%) ] 3.7% yield

Home Depot [ HD 30.41 -0.12 (-0.39%) ] 3.1% yield

What do you do have to watch out for after making “the Number”?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

It will be a mistake for Microsoft to appoint Alan Mulally as CEO.

It interesting that the same bunch of Wall Street analysts, majority of whom have never managed a business or have no deep experience in the industries they cover, are now advocating for Microsoft to appoint a guy from an automobile manufacturer as CEO of a technology company.  One of the lessons folks learn in business school about Mergers and Acquisitions is the incredibly high failure rates. However few fail to grasp the fact that a lot of companies erroneously turn to investment bankers with little or no operational experience to advise on their deals and hence no secret a lot fail.  In current Microsoft situation, again we have investment banking analyst with no operating experience in technology hawking the same bad advice.  Microsoft is a software company with well defined competencies in that space, but it is going up against Google, Apple, Samsung, and possibily Blackberry, all companies with younger and more visonary leadership able to deliver user experiences with produ

We shall hold them accountable, to their children's children

He called me when he arrived in New York and gave me the address where he was staying that night. However, because of a previous engagement, I could not see him that evening. So, the following morning, at the height of the New York rush hour, I drove into the city from Connecticut to see him.  Over lunch, Baah Wiredu, the former Finance Minister, shared with me his desire to solve the problem of abusive contracting and corruption in how the government awarded contracts.  He was determined to do something about it and had complained about how a road construction contract given to a local chief was never honored.  His determination to do something about such abuses showed in his face and his obvious weight loss was a testament to the task he envisioned. The plan to roll out a set of initiatives to take on corruption began the day I walked into his office to help him map out his entire reporting structure in the ministry. Just a few minutes after we sat down, a man walked in to tell him

MISRULE OF THE FEW - How the Oligarchs Ruined Greece


By Pavlos Eleftheriadis Just a few years ago, Greece came perilously close to defaulting on its debts and exiting the eurozone. Today, thanks to the largest sovereign bailout in history, the country’s economy is showing new signs of life. In exchange for promises that Athens would enact aggressive austerity measures, the so-called troika -- the European Central Bank, the European Commission, and the International Monetary Fund -- provided tens of billions of dollars in emergency loans. From the perspective of many global investors and European officials, those policies have paid off. Excluding a one-off expenditure to recapitalize its banks, Greece’s budget shortfall totaled roughly two percent last year, down from nearly 16 percent in 2009. Last year, the country ran a current account surplus for the first time in over three decades. And this past April, Greece returned to the international debt markets it had been locked out of for four years, issuing $4 billion in five-year governm